AnsweredAssumed Answered

What constitutes significant alteration?

Question asked by Chris Bentley on Dec 7, 2017
Latest reply on Dec 18, 2017 by Milton Werner

Specification writers have a tendency of writing that systems, especially controls, must be designed and supplied to the latest code.  The particular concern I have is with a question around burner management systems for multi-burner boilers.  If a BMS were built to 8506 1998 edition and the hardware driving the logic is considered obsolete would replacing the BMS hardware be considered a significant alteration?  Would it be reasonable that new BMS hardware get installed and programmed to meet the requirements of NFPA 85 2015 while still retaining the original Code of Construction? 

Outcomes